forge-sec combines technical evidence, exploitability, exposure, asset importance, and remediation context to show teams what needs attention first—and why.
Critical, High, Medium, and Low findings appear in a long queue with limited guidance on what should be fixed first.
See what requires immediate action, what can be planned, and the evidence behind every priority decision.
Determine whether the application, API, host, or service is public or reachable through another asset.
Evaluate attack complexity, authentication requirements, exploit availability, and validation evidence.
Weight systems supporting sensitive data, customers, authentication, payments, or essential operations.
Assess the likelihood of data exposure, account compromise, disruption, or infrastructure access.
An exposed production API can require immediate action, while a technically critical issue on an isolated test system may follow a planned remediation cycle.
Confirmed or highly exploitable vulnerabilities affecting exposed, sensitive, or business-critical systems.
Serious risks that should be assigned and resolved during the next remediation sprint or patching cycle.
Important findings with limited current exposure that can move through scheduled engineering or infrastructure work.
Lower-risk or constrained findings that remain visible and are reassessed whenever conditions change.
forge-sec turns prioritized vulnerabilities into actionable remediation work with the evidence, ownership context, and practical fix guidance teams need to move forward.
After remediation, retest affected assets and automatically update the queue using the latest scan evidence.